Government IT
critics 'creating mood of national defeatism'
By Nicholas
Timmins,Public Policy Editor
FINANCIAL
TIMES Published: January 23 2007 02:00 | Last updated: January 23 2007 02:00
Endless
and inaccurate criticism of government IT projects risks creating a mood of
"national defeatism" over the use of modern technology in government
services, Pat McFadden, the minister responsible for e-government has warned.
Projects
did go wrong, he said, and when they did, "we should hold our hands up, fix
the problem and
But
it was "factually wrong" to say that was the case for all government
investment in technology. A wide range of projects from the Pensions Service to
online renewal of car tax to the transport department's journey planner were all
working well.
"Tens
of thousands of people, right now, are completing self-assessment income tax
returns online," he said.
Critics
also repeatedly cited projects as failures when they hit trouble for a time and
were then put right. For example, the Passport Agency was repeatedly described
as an IT failure because of chaos when a new system was introduced in 1999.
"But that was six or seven years ago. Since then it has worked extremely
well," he said. "To describe it as a failure is simply inaccurate.
"Government
cannot ignore the availability of technology to improve services when people are
shopping online, banking online and using technology in every other part of
their lives," said Mr McFadden.
"We
cannot allow the belief to take hold that somehow government cannot be part of
this change - that we should be frozen in time and not drive through projects to
improve the quality of service because someone says it won't work."
The
minister said government did face the challenge that many of its IT applications
were hugely complex, dealing with many millions of people, with many operating
on a scale and with a reach far greater than in the private sector. So things
did go wrong.
"But
there seems to be a sort of 'established truth' that they all go wrong, and too
many people appear not to want to listen when the facts are otherwise," he
said. To argue that the government could never get projects right created a
sense of "national defeatism". If that was listened to, it "would
hold us back as a country".
If
government-based IT really never worked, he said, 13m benefit payments would not
be being made every week, a million biometric passports would not have been
issued in the past year, and several million people would not have been able to
renew their car tax online.
It
was right that the public should demand value for money from government
projects, said Mr McFadden, and right that there should be criticism when they
went wrong. But the ambition to improve services should not be defeated by a
nostalgia that said government services should not be part of the modern world.
Copyright
The Financial Times Limited 2007