MarketViews
A TechMarketView report on the trends
and forecasts for the
UK software and IT services market
February 2009
www.techmarketview.com
Contents
2 global Software and IT services markets
3 the UK software and IT services market
3.5.8 Market size and forecast
5.1 Software and IT services sector definitions
·
Predictions (from 2007)
·
Themes/Campaigns, e.g.:
o
Make do and mend/more for less
o
Boring awards
·
Highlights, lowlights and significant events, e.g.
o
Economy
o
Financial markets (public, private equity etc)
o
Industry structure (births, deaths and marriages)
o
Major deals
·
Themes/Campaigns
·
Predictions
·
Size and growth by class of expenditure
·
Size and growth by product/service line
·
Size and growth by region
·
Size and growth by vertical
·
Size and growth by class of expenditure
·
Size and growth by product/service line
·
Size and growth by region
·
Size and growth by vertical
·
Size and growth by class of expenditure
·
Size and growth by product/service line
·
Size and growth by vertical
·
Growth in real terms inc/exc special events
For suppliers to the UK SITS market, there are only
three questions that really matter right now:
1. How deep do you have to dig your
bunker?
2. When will it be safe to climb
out?
3. Who will be left standing?
The first question is best answered this way: keep digging! Although recent trading
updates from the major IT services players such as xxx, xxx and xxx, have, on the whole,
portended reasonable results for 2008, almost all reported rapidly
deteriorating visibility and saw business decline dramatically towards the end
of the year and. It’s the same story for many software companies. SAP’s warning
late October of “uncertainties surrounding the current
economic and business environment” prompted management to revoke its
revenue guidance entirely to focus on profit. Similar sentiments were echoed by
xxx, xxx and xxx. We have yet to reach the nadir.
For the answer to the second question, look back to our last recession. The
real one, that is, not the dot.com bust. Back in 2000, we were coming off a
combination of the highs of a massive re-programming effort to ‘fix’ the Y2K
problem, coupled with increasingly speculative IT investment in new technologies,
notably the internet. One of the effects of the first ‘high’ was to bring
forward many new software upgrade programmes slated for the first couple of
years of the new decade. The effect of the second was to confirm business
leaders’ worst fears about the true return on investment in their IT systems
and (clearly belatedly) forced them to institute a more commercial approach to
IT proposals as they would for any other capex business case. Both effects
combined to severely restrict IT spending for three years and forever change
the way major IT projects were justified and structured.
Sample figure (needs header and footer)
_files/image002.gif)
The current IT downturn started quite differently,
of course. This time the problem is neither caused by nor limited to the IT
sector. The credit crunch is throwing the economies of the developed world into
recession, and reining back growth in emerging markets. The idea that companies
will spend more on IT to help them through the recession is a fallacy.
Companies are spending less on IT – they always do in a downturn – and
directing that spend on cost-saving initiatives. (Need some examples of prior recessions and how IT market growth
tracked the downs and the recovery). We expect the UK S/ITS market will shrink 2% this year but growth
should return in 2010.
As for the third question, as in every other downturn there will be winners and losers. The
winners will generally be those companies that have long-term contracted
revenue streams with high dependence on their customers’ core business
operations and low dependence on transaction volumes. For IT services players,
this mainly favours infrastructure outsourcing, applications management, and
many types of back-office BPO. Software players will be faced with a paucity of
new licence sales and licence upgrades; the most resilient revenues will come
from contracted maintenance agreements and, on a much smaller scale, SaaS
subscriptions.
Those SITS firms that manage to survive will, as
after prior downturns, emerge leaner, meaner and hopefully smarter too. They’ll
need to be, because, as before, IT spending will not simply jump back to
pre-downturn levels. Instead, customers will rebase their IT budgets to these
‘recession’ levels of spend and re-justify projects that had been put on hold
to ensure that the payback is both real and timely.
Another sample chart
_files/image006.gif)
Let’s take a quick look at the key trends we think
will influence the size and growth of the UK SITS market in 2009 and beyond:
The economy
This
will remain the dominant factor affecting SITS demand in 2009. We think the
Chancellor’s expectations of a second-half pick up highly optimistic – at least
six months too early, more likely closer to twelve months (i.e. 2H 2010).
Demand trends
·
The primary focus for most enterprises will remain on
reducing costs and conserving cash.
·
Customers will remain mainly in ‘make do and mend’ mode for
their IT systems, and insist on ‘more for less’ from their suppliers. Pricing
power will stay with the customer.
·
With the majority of IT spend still allocated to ‘keeping
the lights on’, system consolidation and rationalisation (e.g. through
virtualisation) and outsourcing legacy application maintenance (including
offshoring) will stay high on the CIO agenda.
·
However, CIOs will be far more cautious about outsourcing to
Indian players in the light of the Satyam scandal. ‘Onshore’ players with
sufficient offshore capacity will benefit, but competition will ensure that
they will see little extra pricing advantage.
·
Anything to do with managing risk and regulatory compliance
and corporate governance will push its way up the budget priority list.
·
The ‘Green’ IT agenda will be shown up for what it has been
all along – a convenient banner to cloak electricity cost-cutting – so, what’s
not to like?
·
Government plans to boost public spending will take time to
trickle through to the IT sector, so suppliers are unlikely to gain material
benefit in 2009.
Procurement trends
Decision
making cycles will remain lengthy as spending proposals go through extra levels
of scrutiny, both in terms of absolute cost and return on investment. This will
continue to predicate breaking down large-scale programmes into smaller chunks
and awarding each piece to the optimum bidder. I say ‘optimum’ because in the
light of recent company scandals and failures, CIOs should be applying a higher
level of due diligence to their potential (and indeed current) suppliers before
deciding whether the lowest bid is also the safest bid! This could provide a
boost for third party sourcing advisors such as TPI and Equaterra, though they
might feel the need to polish up their own contract liability limitation
clauses!
Technology trends
Cloud/SaaS: There will
continue to be more heat than light coming from behind the ‘Cloud’, at least
for the next couple of years. Established on-premise software vendors may find
themselves between a rock and a hard place trying to chase the Cloud. In the
current economic climate they will find it difficult to fund the necessary
R&D work to convert their products to ‘true’ SaaS delivery. More likely
they will be forced to deliver ‘pseudo-SaaS’ by changing their financial model
from the traditional upfront licence fee + monthly maintenance charge, to a
monthly rental fee, with the obvious adverse effect on revenue, profits and
cash flow. Cloud start-ups are probably better positioned (if they can find the
funding) but they are hardly likely to upset the traditional market leaders for
some considerable time.
Mobile
Internet:
Frankly, it’s hard to see who’s actually going to make a buck here. With mobile
internet devices (MIDs) such as ‘netbooks’ selling for under £100, wafer thin
margins will have to be shared along the value chain. Arguably the telcos/ISPs
have most to gain if they can find the right charging model. MID software will
need to be free or nearly so, which makes it tricky for traditional players to
earn money even if MIDs are sold in the millions. That leaves the IT services
players, who might pick up some contracts to ‘MID-enable’ business
applications, but I can’t see much of that happening while the lid is still
firmly closed on the ‘new development’ agenda.
SOA: The ‘nth’
incarnation of modular programming. Brilliant if you are a software vendor,
rocket science if you are a CIO. There’s no extra money in this for suppliers –
it’s just the way applications will increasingly be developed.
Open Systems: Nothing new
here. It’s still as difficult as ever to make money by giving away your
product. But as a potential exception, I doff my cap to Misys, which had the
canny idea to develop open source interconnect products for the healthcare
sector and give them away for free, to try to encourage medical institutions
using competitive software to migrate to Misys’ own products. Otherwise, CIOs
will generally remain wary about committing critical development to platforms
with questionable support commitment. Fine if the applications come as a
‘locked down’ suite that rarely needs updating (e.g. office productivity tools)
but risky for ‘real’ business applications.
Supplier trends
We
will cover supplier trends and industry dynamics in much more detail in our
quarterly TechMarketView IndustryViews report series. But in summary:
·
Just as for user enterprises, the primary focus for most
suppliers will remain on reducing costs and conserving cash. External funding
will remain tight, so there could be some ‘bargain basement’ rights issues and
share placings for those companies perceived to have a strong enough business
model to weather the storm. The rest will get consolidated or simply go bust.
·
Suppliers will be even more tempted to ‘win the business at
any price’ to feed the top line. It will be impossible to make up the lost
margin simply by cutting SG&A. Those suppliers who do not have sufficient
low cost ‘delivery’ (and I include product R&D in that term) already in
place will see margins massacred.
·
We are sure to see more M&A in the industry this year as
players look to grow their businesses inorganically in the face of declining
demand. There’s a balancing act here, of course. On the one hand, you may well gain
share, but this must not be at the cost of margin and cash flow. This makes the
selection of M&A targets even more critical, and leaves no room for error
in integration.
The biggest event in IT services in 2008 was
undoubtedly HP’s acquisition of EDS. Finally our predictions of ‘big eats big’
came true, and we doubt this will be the last megadeal of this ilk. The
ramifications of this merger will take some time to really become apparent, as
HP wrestles with the best way to go to market with the Plano giant in its
basket. As we write (Jan. ’09), HP has rolled EDS into its enterprise hardware
and software business, raising fears that the former outsourcing giant will
become a glorified HP channel. This may not do much for EDS’ reputation for
‘vendor independence’ (a moot point anyway) but could really boost HP’s
hardware footprint in large enterprises.
We also saw a number of well-known mid-size UK IT
services go under the hammer last year, Axon, Northgate, and Detica among them.
As we said just before, there’s a lot more yet to come.
On the global IT services scene there were some
truly significant acquisition-cum-outsourcing megadeals which affected the UK
market in some shape or form, all by Indian players:
·
In July, WNS, the ex-British
Airways BPO captive, acquired UK insurance giant Aviva’s Indian BPO captive,
Aviva Global Services for £115m, and secured an eight-year, $1bn outsourcing
deal
·
In October, TCS did much the same
with Citigroup, stumping up over $500m to buy its BPO captive, CGSL in return
for a $2.5bn, 9.5 year deal, the largest ever awarded to an Indian player.
·
Just before Xmas, Wipro acquired
Citigroup’s Indian IT services captive, CITOS, for $127m and secured a $500m,
six-year outsourcing deal. CITOS services most of Citi’s worldwide businesses
outside of Latin America including the UK.
These deals should dispel any remaining doubts that
the major Indian SIs (excepting Satyam, of course!) are fully accredited
players in the global IT services marketplace.
This type of deal was not the sole domain of the
Indians. In November, UK recruitment firm Harvey Nash acquired one of
Alcatel-Lucent’s strategic R&D centres in Nuremberg, bringing with it a
€54m, 27-month outsourcing contract using Harvey Nash’s offshore centres in
Vietnam. We fully expect to see more of these deals as cash-strapped
enterprises look for ways to raise funds while reducing operational costs.
Here are the key trends we believe will set the
scene for IT services firms in the UK market over and above our comments in Market Trends above :
Global delivery
As we said above, cutting SG&A will not make up
for lost revenues. Frankly, if you don’t already have sufficient low-cost
delivery already in place, then 2009 is going to be a tough year to hold on to
your margin. Large players need to build low cost delivery organically or
acquisitively (not without risk, of course). Smaller players should partner
first and then acquire.
Go-to-market
When there’s little new business around, you need
to look after your own! Clearly, competitors will go hunting after those
companies still spending money, so suppliers need to make sure their own
customers are very well looked after. But you should be doing this anyway,
shouldn’t you!
If
you believe the hype, then “the cloud” is the biggest thing that has ever
happened in the computer industry. In fact it has made a negligible financial
impact so far but all the vendors are polishing up their offerings for a big
push in 2009. Every vendor you can think of will have a cloud offering whether
it makes sense or not!
As
always caution is recommended; we have been writing about similar offerings
(ASP, SaaS) for many years and have been burnt before by being over optimistic
about their introduction. However, market conditions do seem ripe for the cloud
to have a major impact in 2009. In fact its success is assured as many current
offerings will just be re-badged as part of cloud offerings; indeed all IT
services will be offered in the cloud.
The
pioneer in cloud based applications (aka SaaS) has undoubtedly been
salesforce.com which has had widespread corporate acceptance and now generates
over $1billion annual revenues. Efforts in this space from the likes of Oracle
and SAP have always seemed “me too” and their success has been very limited in
spite of the money they have spent on them. However the trend is undoubtedly
towards allowing you to run any old software in the cloud so maybe they won’t
be disadvantaged so much in the future.
Google
has made great efforts to get its Google Docs and Apps programmes up and
running. Like many people, we have toyed with them but it’s going to take a lot
to move us on from Microsoft Office and all that other Windows stuff we have
become accustomed to. Maybe our new netbooks will encourage us to start
changing.
Every large infrastructure
vendor is gearing up for the cloud; whoever would have believed that a
bookseller would have probably the most successful offering so far. Amazon has
certainly obtained first mover advantage with its Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud
(Amazon EC2) offering. Oracle certainly seems to be jumping on their bandwagon.
IBM has been busily opening Cloud Computer Centres around the world during 2008
and we expect a major company wide initiative to be launched in 2009. Clearly
it will be a “services” led offering; there’s going to be some interesting discussions
about revenue recognition between the various parts of IBM!
And then of course there’s Microsoft’s
Azure platform, a cloud extension to Windows. At the moment this is purely a
development platform but it will be interesting to see what Microsoft and the
rest of the world does with it.
The
PC software market will definitely decline in 2009. This trend was underway
even before the credit crunch hit us. Dell’s recent cost cutting announcements
underline just how tough things are likely to be. Vista introduction has been
very slow and it now seems obvious that many companies will skip Vista all
together and wait for Windows 7 in 2010, or whenever the first Service Pack
comes out.
The
rise of the netbook is certainly gloomy news for Microsoft. Although most
netbooks are currently being sold with Windows XP (certainly not Vista!) it
does seem that more and more will be offered with Linux.
Apple
has had an encouraging year really re-establishing itself in the corporate
computing world. However, just as the “organic food” is in for a tough time in
the recession, Apple is likely to suffer a similar fate this year.
We
have been writing about the rise and rise of Open Source for some time. The
outstanding success has of course been the business built on top of Linux. Most
established software vendors now have open source offerings; however for many
vendors, it is more like an introductory offer: if you want the real software
which has all the features you want and will scale, then you are back to their
traditional products.
So
far much open source adoption has been bottom up inspired by technicians who
had a semi religious hatred of Microsoft. In these recessionary times we are
likely to see the threat of more strategic adoption of open source, even if
just to keep the existing vendors honest.
It
seems somewhat ironic that after all the debate about open and closed source
that software itself will disappear into the cloud and its origin will become
irrelevant.
Has
it happened, or did it go away while we weren’t looking? Companies will
continue to do mashups with their existing software but will come to realise
that in many cases it is just lipstick on a pig. The fashion conscious will
clearly switch to their cloud initiatives this year.
There
is a predictable backlash to SOA underway. Having been held up as IT’s latest
silver bullet by the marketing departments this was inevitable. There’s no
getting away from the fact that SOA is hard to do and as always the number of
people we have in the industry capable of doing it remains tiny. However, there
is nothing wrong with the concepts underlying SOA. We suspect that just like OO
it will disappear from most people’s view and then become really useful to
those who do understand it.
Although
we struggle to remember how we could get away with it, software revenues (at
least for start up companies) have always been dominated by the initial licence
fee users could be persuaded to pay. In these recessionary times some new
vendors such as the UK’s Bond International and smartFOCUS have been
experimenting with a monthly payment type model even for “on premise” software,
to bring it more in line with the SaaS model of charging. We think that this is
the way forward to promote sales to SMEs and of course government which likes
opex rather than capex spending. However both vendors have found the transition
difficult issuing profit warnings in last quarter.
For
established vendors such as Sage, its support and maintenance
contracts will remain the backbone of the business. Sage has been very creative
developing new tiered support offerings, witness combined support and software
upgrade contract revenues growing 12% in 2008. While the prospects for new
licence sales and upgrades look rather bleak in Sage’s mature markets, at least
the cash should keep flowing.
The
software industry is fast consolidating. There is just no room for mid size
players; you can only survive in the long term by becoming one of the big boys
(tough to do!) or remaining a niche player dominating a sector or geography. We
are sure to see more M&A in the industry this year as players look to grow
their businesses in the face of declining demand. There’s a balancing act here,
of course. On the one hand, you gain share, but this cannot be at the cost of
margin and cash flow. This makes the selection of M&A targets even more
critical, and leaves no room for error in integration.
We
will see widespread cost cutting during 2009. Microsoft employees are currently
waiting on tenterhooks to see where the job cuts are coming and there will be
many more. As usual it will be the marketing departments who suffer first.
After that it will R&D with continued off shoring of development and
maintenance being the principal way of saving cost. We do hope that no one is
tempted to cut costs by playing around with creative capitalisation of software
costs (a long crusade of Richard’s.)